Ex-refs chief delivers verdict on Liverpool star whose aggressive conduct left Burnley players incensed

Conor Bradley received a dubious yellow card for a rash tackle on Jaidon Anthony in Liverpool’s 1-0 victory over Burnley.

Former PGMOL chief and ex-FIFA official Keith Hackett exclusively told Football Insider his take on a late tackle by the Northern Irishman in the Reds’ tight 1-0 win over the Clarets.

Prior to the match, Newcastle United fans were thrilled that Alexander Isak was left out of the Liverpool squad after making his move on transfer deadline day.

Arne Slot revealed Isak could feature for Liverpool against Atletico Madrid as he continues to build up his match fitness after no pre-season minutes.

Gut-wrenchingly, Burnley’s Lesley Ugochukwu received a red card against Liverpool for a second bookable offence which was the downfall of the Clarets superb dogged performance.

Alexander Isak in action for Liverpool
Credit: Manh Tung – Breaking Media

Keith Hackett in agreement with Michael Oliver as Conor Bradley only sees a yellow card

In the 75th minute, the Northern Ireland international picked up his first booking after coming on for Alexis Mac Allister at half-time.

The right-back lunged in on Burnley winger Anthony, connecting with his right foot and fouling the 25-year-old in the process.

Scott Parker and his players were incensed with Michael Oliver’s decision to only brandish a yellow card instead of a red one given the aggressive nature of the challenge.

Serious Foul Play requirement not met as Conor Bradley received correct judgement

The number 12 swerved a potential suspension due to his tackle not meeting the threshold that would lead to a straight red card with VAR not intervening to overturn the decision.

Conor Bradley running in Liverpool shirt looking focused
Credit: Imago

Speaking exclusively to Football Insider former referee Hackett said: “I support the yellow card for a reckless challenge by Conor Bradley.

“It did not fulfil the requirement for a red card of ‘Serious Foul Play’ because the challenge did not meet the excessive force criteria.”